atdaelatbeschrest.gq/map16.php Corriero tackles in his recent book, Judging Children as Children: As the Presiding Judge and founder of Manhattan's Youth Part, a New York City court specifically designed to resolve cases of children as young as 13 who are tried as adults, Judge Corriero draws upon his wealth of firsthand experience in the field to present a compelling argument for a revised system of justice that takes into account the mental, emotional, and physical abilities of young people in order to provide them with an opportunity to be rehabilitated as productive members of society instead of being locked up in jail.
At a time when America's court system increasingly tries juvenile offenders as adults, Michael Corriero draws directly from his experience as the founding j. Judging Children As Children: A Proposal for a Juvenile Justice System [Michael Corriero] on uzotoqadoh.tk *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. When is it.
Join us for a special evening as Judge Corriero shares his invaluable insight and guiding principles behind his latest proposal for a better juvenile justice system that seeks to improve the lives of children and ensure the safety of our communities. Judge Corriero will also sign copies of his new book at the conclusion of his lecture.
Judging Children as Children: Discover what to read next. Books of the Week.
He rails against the stark failures of our current juvenile and criminal justice systems in handling troubled adolescents, but then he pushes us to pursue a hybrid justice system which would both improve childrens' lives and keep our communities safer. From a place of real wisdom and compassion, Michael A. Corriero makes an eloquent case for its realization.
His book is a plea for the deepest meaning of 'the public good. His groundbreaking Manhattan courtroom has proved to be a national model for steering troubled kids away from careers in crime.
With legal rigor and an ear for a good story, the judge culls from this experience to argue for a new juvenile justice system, one that allows judges more discretion to treat children as children. He advocates a model that identifies violent youths and dispositions that focus on educating offenders, and he calls for no less than a reversal of trends in criminal justice and get-tough attitudes, which vary from state to state. He intersperses sociological studies with vignettes from his own court in this cogent argument and appeal for changes in how youths are treated in criminal cases.
It is political and philosophical.